Dream Wired
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Celebrity
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • TV
  • Music
  • Comics
  • Shop
  • Home
  • Celebrity
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • TV
  • Music
  • Comics
  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
Dream Wired
No Result
View All Result
Home DramaAlert

Harvey Weinstein’s rape conviction overturned from #MeToo trial – National

rmtsa by rmtsa
April 25, 2024
in DramaAlert
0
Harvey Weinstein’s rape conviction overturned from #MeToo trial – National
74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


You might also like

GiveSendGo CFO Speaks on Shiloh Hendrix Donations After Racial Slur Video Goes Viral • Hollywood Unlocked

Druski Says Accuser’s Lawyers Should’ve Seen Huge Holes in Her Claims

Jessa Duggar Hits Back at Suggestion She and Husband Ben Seewald Are ‘Breeding Like Rabbits’

New York’s highest court on Thursday overturned Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 rape conviction, finding the judge at the landmark #MeToo trial prejudiced the ex-movie mogul with “egregious” improper rulings, including a decision to let women testify about allegations that weren’t part of the case.

“We conclude that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes,” the court’s 4-3 decision said. “The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial.”

The state Court of Appeals ruling reopens a painful chapter in America’s reckoning with sexual misconduct by powerful figures — an era that began in 2017 with a flood of allegations against Weinstein. His accusers could again be forced to relive their traumas on the witness stand.

The court’s majority said “it is an abuse of judicial discretion to permit untested allegations of nothing more than bad behavior that destroys a defendant’s character but sheds no light on their credibility as related to the criminal charges lodged against them.”

Story continues below advertisement

In a stinging dissent, Judge Madeline Singas wrote that the majority was “whitewashing the facts to conform to a he-said/she-said narrative,” and said the Court of Appeals was continuing a “disturbing trend of overturning juries’ guilty verdicts in cases involving sexual violence.”


Click to play video: 'Harvey Weinstein extradited to California to face further sexual assault charges'

0:33
Harvey Weinstein extradited to California to face further sexual assault charges


“The majority’s determination perpetuates outdated notions of sexual violence and allows predators to escape accountability,” Singas wrote.

Weinstein, 72, has been serving a 23-year sentence in a New York prison following his conviction on charges of criminal sex act for forcibly performing oral sex on a TV and film production assistant in 2006 and rape in the third degree for an attack on an aspiring actress in 2013.

He will remain imprisoned because he was convicted in Los Angeles in 2022 of another rape and sentenced to 16 years in prison. Weinstein was acquitted in Los Angeles on charges involving one of the women who testified in New York.

Story continues below advertisement

Weinstein’s lawyers argued Judge James Burke’s rulings in favor of the prosecution turned the trial into “1-800-GET-HARVEY.”

Breaking news from Canada and around the world
sent to your email, as it happens.

The reversal of Weinstein’s conviction is the second major #MeToo setback in the last two years, after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of a Pennsylvania court decision to throw out Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction.

Weinstein’s conviction stood for more than four years, heralded by activists and advocates as a milestone achievement, but dissected just as quickly by his lawyers and, later, the Court of Appeals when it heard arguments on the matter in February.


Click to play video: 'Peter Nygard’s son alleges fashion mogul had ‘more accusations than Epstein, Weinstein and Cosby combined’'

4:46
Peter Nygard’s son alleges fashion mogul had ‘more accusations than Epstein, Weinstein and Cosby combined’


Allegations against Weinstein, the once powerful and feared studio boss behind such Oscar winners as “Pulp Fiction” and “Shakespeare in Love,” ushered in the #MeToo movement. Dozens of women came forward to accuse Weinstein, including famous actresses such as Ashley Judd and Uma Thurman. His New York trial drew intense publicity, with protesters chanting “rapist” outside the courthouse.

Story continues below advertisement

Weinstein is incarcerated in New York at the Mohawk Correctional Facility, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) northwest of Albany.

He maintains his innocence. He contends any sexual activity was consensual.

Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala argued before the appeals court in February that Burke swayed the trial by allowing three women to testify about allegations that weren’t part of the case and by giving prosecutors permission to confront Weinstein, if he had testified, about his long history of brutish behavior.

Aidala argued the extra testimony went beyond the normally allowable details about motive, opportunity, intent or a common scheme or plan, and essentially put Weinstein on trial for crimes he wasn’t charged with.

Weinstein wanted to testify, but opted not to because Burke’s ruling would’ve meant answering questions about more than two-dozen alleged acts of misbehavior dating back four decades, Aidala said. They included fighting with his movie producer brother, flipping over a table in anger and snapping at waiters and yelling at his assistants.

Trending Now

Canada refused to repatriate woman from ISIS camp because she can’t be arrested: internal memo

Canadians more likely to eat food past best-before date. What are the risks?

“We had a defendant who was begging to tell his side of the story. It’s a he said, she said case, and he’s saying ‘that’s not how it happened. Let me tell you how I did it,’” Aidala argued. Instead, the jurors heard evidence of Weinstein’s prior bad behavior that “had nothing to do with truth and veracity. It was all ‘he’s a bad guy.’”

Story continues below advertisement


Click to play video: '‘This is what justice looks like’: Gloria Allred commends Weinstein’s 23-year sentence'

3:10
‘This is what justice looks like’: Gloria Allred commends Weinstein’s 23-year sentence


Aidala also took issue with Burke’s refusal to remove a juror who had written a novel involving predatory older men, a topic the defense lawyer argued too closely resembled the issues in Weinstein’s case.

A lawyer for the Manhattan district attorney’s office, which prosecuted the case, argued that the judge‘s rulings were proper and that the extra evidence and testimony he allowed was important to provide jurors context about Weinstein’s behavior and the way he interacted with women.

“Defendant’s argument was that they had a consensual and loving relationship both before and after the charged incidents,” Appellate Chief Steven Wu argued, referring to one of the women Weinstein was charged with assaulting. The additional testimony “just rebutted that characterization completely.”

Wu said Weinstein’s acquittal on the most serious charges — two counts of predatory sexual assault and a first-degree rape charge involving actor Annabella Sciorra’s allegations of a mid-1990s rape — showed jurors were paying attention and they were not confused or overwhelmed by the additional testimony.

Story continues below advertisement


Click to play video: 'Harvey Weinstein found guilty of rape, sexual assault by jury in LA'

2:57
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of rape, sexual assault by jury in LA


The Associated Press does not generally identify people alleging sexual assault unless they consent to be named; Sciorra has spoken publicly about her allegations.

The Court of Appeals agreed last year to take Weinstein’s case after an intermediate appeals court upheld his conviction. Prior to their ruling, judges on the lower appellate court had raised doubts about Burke’s conduct during oral arguments. One observed that Burke had let prosecutors pile on with “incredibly prejudicial testimony” from additional witnesses.

Burke’s term expired at the end of 2022. He was not reappointed and is no longer a judge.

In appealing, Weinstein’s lawyers sought a new trial, but only for the criminal sexual act charge. They argued the rape charge could not be retried because it involves alleged conduct outside the statute of limitations.



Source link

Tags: convictionHarveyMeTooNationaloverturnedrapetrialWeinsteins
Share30Tweet19
rmtsa

rmtsa

Recommended For You

GiveSendGo CFO Speaks on Shiloh Hendrix Donations After Racial Slur Video Goes Viral • Hollywood Unlocked

by rmtsa
May 10, 2025
0
GiveSendGo CFO Speaks on Shiloh Hendrix Donations After Racial Slur Video Goes Viral • Hollywood Unlocked

In an interview with NewsNation, GiveSendGo CFO Jacob Wells attempted to explain the company’s decision to host the fundraiser. While defending freedom of speech, Wells also acknowledged that...

Read more

Druski Says Accuser’s Lawyers Should’ve Seen Huge Holes in Her Claims

by rmtsa
May 10, 2025
0
Druski Says Accuser’s Lawyers Should’ve Seen Huge Holes in Her Claims

Druski Punish Accuser's Lawyers, Judge!!! Huge Holes in Story, They Should've Known Published May 9, 2025 6:26 PM PDT Druski's not only fighting back against the woman accusing...

Read more

Jessa Duggar Hits Back at Suggestion She and Husband Ben Seewald Are ‘Breeding Like Rabbits’

by rmtsa
May 10, 2025
0
Jessa Duggar Hits Back at Suggestion She and Husband Ben Seewald Are ‘Breeding Like Rabbits’

The 19 Kids and Counting alum takes to YouTube and addresses "rude and unnecessary comments" amid her sixth pregnancy. Jessa Duggar is not here for any criticism about...

Read more

Francis Ford Coppola Talks ‘Megalopolis’ Cult Status & Trump’s Tariffs

by rmtsa
May 9, 2025
0
Francis Ford Coppola Talks ‘Megalopolis’ Cult Status & Trump’s Tariffs

Although Megalopolis was a critical and commercial flop upon its initial release, Francis Ford Coppola is confident the film will find its cult audience. The 5x Oscar winner...

Read more

Diddy trial: Judge delays jury selection due to ‘cold feet’ concerns – National

by rmtsa
May 9, 2025
0
Diddy trial: Judge delays jury selection due to ‘cold feet’ concerns – National

The final stage of jury selection for the sex-trafficking trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs was postponed until early next week ahead of the opening arguments over concerns that...

Read more
Next Post
Eagles’ Reunion Gets Going With Soundstage Show

Eagles' Reunion Gets Going With Soundstage Show

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Celebrity
  • Comics
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • Music
  • TV
  • Uncategorized

CATEGORIES

  • Celebrity
  • Comics
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • Music
  • TV
  • Uncategorized
No Result
View All Result

Recent News

  • We Took A CorePower Yoga Sculpt Class With Jordan Chiles To Celebrate Mental Health Awareness Month
  • Kyle Richards Calls Morgan Wade “Beautiful” After ACM Appearance
  • Charlize Theron Says Uma Thurman Deserved Oscar for ‘Kill Bill’

Copyright © 2023 DramaWired.
DramaWired is a content aggregator and not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Celebrity
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • TV
  • Music
  • Comics
  • Shop

Copyright © 2023 DramaWired.
DramaWired is a content aggregator and not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In