Dream Wired
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Celebrity
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • TV
  • Music
  • Comics
  • Shop
  • Home
  • Celebrity
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • TV
  • Music
  • Comics
  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
Dream Wired
No Result
View All Result
Home DramaAlert

Supreme Court To Rule If Whites Face Higher Bias Standards

rmtsa by rmtsa
October 7, 2024
in DramaAlert
0
Supreme Court To Rule If Whites Face Higher Bias Standards
74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


You might also like

Keyshia Cole Reveals If She’ll Remove Tattoo Of Hunxho’s Name

Sharon Duncan-Brewster Stars In ‘Ballerina’ [Photos]

Tory Lanez Launches Website • Hollywood Unlocked

supreme court, reverse discrimination

by Daniel Johnson

October 6, 2024

A woman maintains she was discriminated against because she’s straight and white.

The Supreme Court will review a reverse discrimination case after a 2023 Ohio court ruling that found Marlean Ames, a straight white woman, did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claim that she was discriminated against because of her race and sexual orientation. Ames contends that she was unfairly treated specifically because she is white and straight.

Ames’ request to review the ruling centers on an argument that the court asked her to make evidentiary showings beyond what is required of minorities who file discrimination claims.

According to Law.com, Ames alleges that her boss, a gay woman, didn’t promote her in order to promote a gay woman whom Ames alleges was unqualified for the position.

According to Ames, she was also removed from her position as a program administrator and replaced by a gay man.

In her petition to the Supreme Court, Ames maintained that it was unfair to require a majority group plaintiffs to show additional circumstances not asked of other plaintiffs who sue under Title VII.

Title VII refers to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a landmark federal law that prohibits employment discrimination. Under Title VII, it is illegal for employers to discriminate against individuals based on certain protected characteristics. These protected classes include: race, color, religion, sx (which includes pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity as interpreted by the courts), and national origin.

As her lawyers argued in her petition, “Discriminatory preference for any group, minority or majority, is precisely and only what Congress has proscribed,” her lawyers wrote, referring to the 1971 Supreme Court decision in Griggs v. Duke Power. “Imposing a background circumstances requirement on majority-group plaintiffs, as five courts of appeals have done, defies these fundamental principles.”

Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed employment discrimination and the application of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case centered on the practices of Duke Power Company, which had a policy of requiring employees to have a high school diploma and pass a standardized intelligence test to qualify for certain positions.

In Ames’ case, she sued upon receiving a right-to-sue letter from the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but a federal court threw out her lawsuit, determining that Ames failed to demonstrate “background circumstances support[ing] the suspicion that [DYS] is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”

According to the ruling, Ames failed to produce a pattern of similar discrimination or any proof that employment decisions were made by members of the gay community.

However, Sixth Circuit Judge Raymond Kethledge wrote in his concurrence that “our court and others have lost their bearings in adopting this rule” and thought that the ruling would result in scrutiny from a higher court.

The State of Ohio, which maintains the Ohio Department of Youth Services, Ames’ former employer, maintained that she was “difficult to work with” and that the Ohio DYS had “nondiscriminatory” reasons for picking another candidate and removing Ames from her position.

According to the State of Ohio, “Ames’s failure to introduce any evidence on this point means that no matter how the Court answers the Question Presented her discrimination claim would still fail at the prima facia stage.”

Ames’ argument is that the Ohio federal court’s decision is a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s Title VII provision, which establishes that it is illegal to discriminate based on an individual’s sexual orientation.

According to Reuters, if the Supreme Court rules in her favor, it could provide a boost to a number of lawsuits from white workers who claim that diversity, equity and inclusion policies discriminated against them. Although the court will hear arguments during its new term, which begins on Oct. 7, no ruling is expected in the case until the end of June 2025.

RELATED CONTENT: Fearless Fund CEO Arian Simone Pushes President Biden To Ignite Executive Action On DEI Following Appeals Court Decision



Source link

Tags: BiascourtFaceHigherRuleStandardsSupremeWhites
Share30Tweet19
rmtsa

rmtsa

Recommended For You

Keyshia Cole Reveals If She’ll Remove Tattoo Of Hunxho’s Name

by rmtsa
May 30, 2025
0
Keyshia Cole Reveals If She’ll Remove Tattoo Of Hunxho’s Name

Keyshia Cole is getting real about her past relationship with Hunxho and how she’s tapped back into her self-worth. Sis spilled all the tea during her stop at...

Read more

Sharon Duncan-Brewster Stars In ‘Ballerina’ [Photos]

by rmtsa
May 30, 2025
0
Sharon Duncan-Brewster Stars In ‘Ballerina’ [Photos]

Ballerina is taking the John Wick universe in a twinkle-toed new direction, and we’ve got exclusive photos of a key character played by Sharon Duncan-Brewster. Source: Ballerina In...

Read more

Tory Lanez Launches Website • Hollywood Unlocked

by rmtsa
May 29, 2025
0
Tory Lanez Launches Website • Hollywood Unlocked

Inside The Website: Tory Lanez’s Team Drops New Evidence Tory Lanez’s legal team launched a new website this week — 36hourslater.com — in a bold attempt to prove...

Read more

Prince’s Security Stopped Diddy From Attacking Cassie at Party, Ex-Assistant Says

by rmtsa
May 29, 2025
0
Prince’s Security Stopped Diddy From Attacking Cassie at Party, Ex-Assistant Says

Diddy Trial Prince's Muscle Stopped Cassie Attack ... Ex-Assistant Testifies Published May 29, 2025 10:20 AM PDT Prince's security intervened when Diddy was starting to attack Cassie outside...

Read more

‘Black People Outside’ Takes Us Inside KOA’s Black Camper Retreat

by rmtsa
May 29, 2025
0
‘Black People Outside’ Takes Us Inside KOA’s Black Camper Retreat

by Jeroslyn JoVonn May 29, 2025 This summer, bring your vibe tribe together for a cozy, inclusive camping getaway. Whether camping or glamping, there’s something beautiful about spending...

Read more
Next Post
Ye’s Bully Album – Here’s Everything We Know

Ye's Bully Album - Here's Everything We Know

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Celebrity
  • Comics
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • Music
  • TV
  • Uncategorized

CATEGORIES

  • Celebrity
  • Comics
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • Music
  • TV
  • Uncategorized
No Result
View All Result

Recent News

  • I Ate Everything on Burger King’s ‘How to Train Your Dragon’ Menu
  • Keyshia Cole Reveals If She’ll Remove Tattoo Of Hunxho’s Name
  • Offset Reportedly Requests Spousal Support From Cardi B

Copyright © 2023 DramaWired.
DramaWired is a content aggregator and not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Celebrity
  • DramaAlert
  • Gossip
  • Movie
  • TV
  • Music
  • Comics
  • Shop

Copyright © 2023 DramaWired.
DramaWired is a content aggregator and not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In